Xeon Bronze 3508U vs Atom x7835RE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7835RE
2024, $127
8 cores / 8 threads, 12 Watt
3.80
Xeon Bronze 3508U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.38
+67.9%

Xeon Bronze 3508U outperforms Atom x7835RE by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16211224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.25no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency33.955.47
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameAmston Lake (2024−2025)no data
Release date8 April 2024 (1 year ago)1 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$127no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per module)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)22.5 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 1264FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 32EUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes980

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom x7835RE 3.80
Xeon Bronze 3508U 6.38
+67.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom x7835RE 6699
Samples: 20
Xeon Bronze 3508U 11248
+67.9%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.80 6.38
Recency 8 April 2024 1 October 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 125 Watt

Atom x7835RE has an age advantage of 6 months, and 941.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3508U, on the other hand, has a 67.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Intel Xeon Bronze 3508U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7835RE in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x7835RE is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3508U is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7835RE
Atom x7835RE
Intel Xeon Bronze 3508U
Xeon Bronze 3508U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7835RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3508U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom x7835RE and Xeon Bronze 3508U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.