Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Atom x7835RE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 2400GE outperforms Atom x7835RE by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1594 | 1549 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.09 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | 35.19 | 12.59 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) | 19 April 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $127 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 5 2400GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 32 |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4950 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 5 2400GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 5 2400GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 5 2400GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 5 2400GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 5 2400GE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.93 | 4.10 |
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 19 April 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom x7835RE has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 2400GE, on the other hand, has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Atom x7835RE and AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Be aware that Atom x7835RE is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2400GE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
