Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Atom x7835RE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 outperforms Atom x7835RE by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1621 | 1184 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 20.25 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 33.95 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $127 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 4 MB + 8 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 3 PRO 210.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.80 | 6.89 |
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 4 Watt |
Atom x7835RE has 100% more physical cores.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210, on the other hand, has a 81.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7835RE in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
