FX-8350 vs Atom x7835RE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7835RE
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 12 Watt
5.29
+41.4%
FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.74

Atom x7835RE outperforms FX-8350 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11891486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.89
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency41.722.83
Architecture codenameAmston Lake (2024)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$127$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1.3 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per module)8192 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 32EUOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7835RE and FX-8350.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes9no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7835RE 5.29
+41.4%
FX-8350 3.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7835RE 8400
+41.5%
FX-8350 5936

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.29 3.74
Recency 8 April 2024 23 October 2012
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 125 Watt

Atom x7835RE has a 41.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 941.7% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7835RE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x7835RE is a notebook processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7835RE and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7835RE
Atom x7835RE
AMD FX-8350
FX-8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7835RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3739 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7835RE or FX-8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.