Celeron G5905T vs Atom x7835RE
Aggregate performance score
Atom x7835RE outperforms Celeron G5905T by a whopping 281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1178 | 2217 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 41.72 | 3.76 |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024) | no data |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $127 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@30Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.29 | 1.39 |
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 1 July 2020 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom x7835RE has a 280.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.
The Atom x7835RE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G5905T in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom x7835RE is a notebook processor while Celeron G5905T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7835RE and Celeron G5905T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
