Atom S1220 vs x7835RE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1594 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.08 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 35.19 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Centerton (2012) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) | 11 December 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $127 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom x7835RE and Atom S1220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7835RE and Atom S1220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FCBGA1283 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 8.1 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7835RE and Atom S1220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7835RE and Atom S1220 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7835RE and Atom S1220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7835RE and Atom S1220.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 8 |
| PCI support | no data | PCI Support |
| UART | no data | UART |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 11 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 8 Watt |
Atom x7835RE has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
Atom S1220, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom x7835RE and Intel Atom S1220. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom x7835RE is a notebook processor while Atom S1220 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
