FX PRO-8800P vs Atom x7809C
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | 2 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $117 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 1 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 250 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Radeon R7 8CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 2 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom x7809C has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
FX PRO-8800P, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7809C and FX PRO-8800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
