EPYC Embedded 8124P vs Atom x7809C
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1344 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 32.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 22.90 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $117 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom x7809C and EPYC Embedded 8124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.45 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,750 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7809C and EPYC Embedded 8124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7809C and EPYC Embedded 8124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7809C and EPYC Embedded 8124P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7809C and EPYC Embedded 8124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7809C and EPYC Embedded 8124P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 125 Watt |
Atom x7809C has an age advantage of 6 months, and 400% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 8124P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom x7809C and AMD EPYC Embedded 8124P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom x7809C is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8124P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
