i7-14701E vs Atom x7809C
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-14701E outperforms Atom x7809C by a whopping 178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1342 | 536 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 31.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 22.89 | 24.45 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) | July 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $117 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom x7809C and Core i7-14701E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7809C and Core i7-14701E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7809C and Core i7-14701E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom x7809C and Core i7-14701E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7809C and Core i7-14701E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7809C and Core i7-14701E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7809C and Core i7-14701E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.34 | 14.83 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Atom x7809C has 160% lower power consumption.
i7-14701E, on the other hand, has a 177.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.
The Intel Core i7-14701E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7809C in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom x7809C is a notebook processor while Core i7-14701E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
