5 320 vs Atom x7809C
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1381 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 32.00 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 9.08 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (2 years ago) | 16 April 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $117 | $340 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom x7809C and Core 5 320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7809C and Core 5 320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7809C and Core 5 320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Atom x7809C and Core 5 320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7809C and Core 5 320 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7809C and Core 5 320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7809C and Core 5 320.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 6 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 16 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom x7809C has 33% more physical cores and 33% more threads.
Core 5 320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom x7809C and Intel Core 5 320. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
