Athlon 1400 (B) vs Atom x7809C
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Amston Lake (2024) | Thunderbird B (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) | 6 June 2001 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $117 | $253 |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7809C and Athlon 1400 (B) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 120 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 37 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7809C and Athlon 1400 (B) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 72 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7809C and Athlon 1400 (B). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7809C and Athlon 1400 (B) are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7809C and Athlon 1400 (B). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7809C and Athlon 1400 (B).
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 6 June 2001 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 72 Watt |
Atom x7809C has an age advantage of 22 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 188% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom x7809C and AMD Athlon 1400 (B). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom x7809C is a notebook processor while Athlon 1400 (B) is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
