Ultra 5 225F vs Atom x7425E
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 225F outperforms Atom x7425E by a whopping 457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1589 | 313 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 65.14 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 27.31 | 28.09 |
| Architecture codename | Gracemont (2023) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $231 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 6 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | no data | 243 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | FCLGA1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 24EU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7425E and Core Ultra 5 225F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.45 | 19.22 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 65 Watt |
Atom x7425E has 441.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 5 225F, on the other hand, has a 457.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Core Ultra 5 225F is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7425E in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom x7425E is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 225F is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
