Threadripper PRO 7945WX vs Atom x7211E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2396 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 10.48 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Gracemont (2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 19 October 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,399 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Atom x7211E and Threadripper PRO 7945WX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7211E and Threadripper PRO 7945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7211E and Threadripper PRO 7945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom x7211E and Threadripper PRO 7945WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7211E and Threadripper PRO 7945WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7211E and Threadripper PRO 7945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7211E and Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 144 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 19 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 350 Watt |
Atom x7211E has 5733% lower power consumption.
Threadripper PRO 7945WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom x7211E and AMD Threadripper PRO 7945WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom x7211E is a notebook processor while Threadripper PRO 7945WX is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
