Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Atom x7211E
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) outperforms Atom x7211E by a whopping 2764% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2191 | 52 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 25.38 | 54.53 |
| Designer | Intel | Apple |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gracemont (2023) | no data |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7211E and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7211E and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7211E and M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom x7211E and M4 Max (14 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7211E and M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7211E and M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7211E and M4 Max (14 cores).
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.59 | 45.54 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 80 Watt |
Atom x7211E has 1233.3% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has a 2764.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7211E in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
