Celeron G4900 vs Atom x7-Z8750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-Z8750
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.84
Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
1.55
+84.5%

Celeron G4900 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25582105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.56 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1631
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)no data54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 405Intel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memory8 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency600 MHz1.05 GHz
Execution Units16no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x21604096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP2560x16004096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes216
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-Z8750 0.84
Celeron G4900 1.55
+84.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7-Z8750 1289
Celeron G4900 2394
+85.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x7-Z8750 178
Celeron G4900 612
+244%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x7-Z8750 526
Celeron G4900 1057
+101%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 1.55
Integrated graphics card 0.72 1.89
Recency 1 April 2016 2 April 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

Atom x7-Z8750 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has a 84.5% higher aggregate performance score, 162.5% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Celeron G4900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x7-Z8750 is a notebook processor while Celeron G4900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-Z8750 and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 20 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 106 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-Z8750 or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.