Processor N100 vs Atom x7-Z8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-Z8700
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.86
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 6 Watt
3.29
+283%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by a whopping 283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24521504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2016)Alder Lake-N
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128
Current price$377 no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads444 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed1.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160no data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes29
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-Z8700 0.86
Processor N100 3.29
+283%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom x7-Z8700 1114
Processor N100 4869
+337%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 337% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x7-Z8700 3116
Processor N100 15207
+388%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 388% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom x7-Z8700 24.51
Processor N100 15.91
+54.1%

Atom x7-Z8700 outperforms Processor N100 by 54% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Atom x7-Z8700 1
Processor N100 5
+311%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 311% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-Z8700 116
Processor N100 467
+303%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 303% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-Z8700 38
Processor N100 152
+305%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 305% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Atom x7-Z8700 0.41
Processor N100 1.83
+346%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 346% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-Z8700 10
Processor N100 34
+229%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 229% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-Z8700 51
Processor N100 173
+240%

Processor N100 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 240% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 3.29
Recency 2 March 2015 3 January 2023
Threads 4 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-Z8700 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Atom x7-Z8700
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 837 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-Z8700 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.