Core Ultra 7 165U vs Atom x7-Z8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-Z8700
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.86
Core Ultra 7 165U
2023
12 cores / 142 x 4.9 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 15 Watt
11.37
+1222%

Ultra 7 165U outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by a whopping 1222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2471643
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Meteor Lake-U
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2016)Meteor Lake-P
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$377 no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4142 x 4.9  GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core8 x 3.8  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core2 x 2.1  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequency600 MHz2 GHz
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x21604096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP2560x16003840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes220
PCI supportno data4.0
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-Z8700 0.86
Ultra 7 165U 11.37
+1222%

Core Ultra 7 165U outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 1222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x7-Z8700 1323
Ultra 7 165U 17592
+1230%

Core Ultra 7 165U outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 1230% in Passmark.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-Z8700 116
Ultra 7 165U 1667
+1337%

Core Ultra 7 165U outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 1337% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-Z8700 38
Ultra 7 165U 252
+572%

Core Ultra 7 165U outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 572% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 11.37
Recency 2 March 2015 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 142 x 4.9 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Core Ultra 7 165U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-Z8700 and Core Ultra 7 165U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Atom x7-Z8700
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
Core Ultra 7 165U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 165U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-Z8700 or Core Ultra 7 165U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.