Pentium III 1000 vs Atom x7-E3950
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2350 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 7x Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.27 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Coppermine (1999−2001) |
| Release date | 26 October 2016 (8 years ago) | 8 March 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | $990 |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 106 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 28 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 33 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 505 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 October 2016 | 8 March 2000 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 33 Watt |
Atom x7-E3950 has an age advantage of 16 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 175% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1000 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium III 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
