GX-210UA vs Atom x7-E3950
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2649 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 7x Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.49 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 30 August 2014 (11 years ago) | 23 April 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7-E3950 and GX-210UA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7-E3950 and GX-210UA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and GX-210UA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom x7-E3950 and GX-210UA technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and GX-210UA are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and GX-210UA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 505 (500 - 650 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and GX-210UA.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 August 2014 | 23 April 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 9 Watt |
Atom x7-E3950 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
GX-210UA, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom x7-E3950 and AMD GX-210UA. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
