Core i5-1340P vs Atom x7-E3950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.21
Core i5-1340P
2023
12 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
12.20
+908%

i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by a whopping 908% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2251591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Raptor Lake-P
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Raptor Lake-P
Release date30 August 2014 (9 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$353
Current price$377 (6.6x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 505Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data80

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.21
i5-1340P 12.20
+908%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 908% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x7-E3950 1864
i5-1340P 18871
+912%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 912% in Passmark.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x7-E3950 2152
i5-1340P 11552
+437%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 437% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Atom x7-E3950 2
i5-1340P 20
+1136%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1136% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-E3950 125
i5-1340P 1756
+1305%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1305% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-E3950 41
i5-1340P 241
+487%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 487% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Atom x7-E3950 0.51
i5-1340P 1.86
+265%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 265% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 1
i5-1340P 9.3
+830%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 830% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 725
i5-1340P 3503
+383%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 383% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 9
i5-1340P 95
+935%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 935% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 45
i5-1340P 229
+407%

Core i5-1340P outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 407% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 12.20
Recency 30 August 2014 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 16
Cost $57 $353
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 28 Watt

The Core i5-1340P is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-E3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Core i5-1340P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
Intel Core i5-1340P
Core i5-1340P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 44 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 238 votes

Rate Core i5-1340P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or Core i5-1340P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.