A10 Micro-6700T vs Atom x7-E3950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.17
+30%
A10 Micro-6700T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.90

Atom x7-E3950 outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23732553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomAMD A-Series
Power efficiency9.2318.93
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Mullins (2014)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketIntel BGA 1296FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 505 (500 - 650 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.17
+30%
A10 Micro-6700T 0.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7-E3950 1864
+30.7%
A10 Micro-6700T 1426

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Atom x7-E3950 2
+8.1%
A10 Micro-6700T 1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Atom x7-E3950 0.51
A10 Micro-6700T 0.55
+7.8%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom x7-E3950 1
+7.5%
A10 Micro-6700T 0.9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.90
Recency 30 August 2014 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 4 Watt

Atom x7-E3950 has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A10 Micro-6700T, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7-E3950 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10 Micro-6700T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and A10 Micro-6700T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
AMD A10 Micro-6700T
A10 Micro-6700T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate A10 Micro-6700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or A10 Micro-6700T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.