i3-8100H vs Atom x5-Z8500
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-8100H outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2623 | 1694 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 5x Intel Atom | Intel Core i3 |
Power efficiency | no data | 5.70 |
Architecture codename | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) |
Release date | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 3 July 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $225 |
Detailed specifications
Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.24 GHz | 3 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 30 |
L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 126 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | UTFCBGA1380 | FCBGA1440 |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | - | + |
Identity Protection | + | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Max video memory | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | 1 GHz |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 4096x2304@30Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600 | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 2 | 16 |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.78 | 2.72 |
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 3.09 |
Recency | 2 March 2015 | 3 July 2018 |
i3-8100H has a 248.7% higher aggregate performance score, 301.3% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 3 years.
The Core i3-8100H is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8500 and Core i3-8100H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.