Celeron G6900TE vs Atom x5-Z8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8350
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.58
Celeron G6900TE
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.53
+164%

Celeron G6900TE outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27112040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2016)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$165 no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.44 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA5921700
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSXno data+
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types4 GBDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 710
Max video memory2 GBno data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1no data
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8350 0.58
Celeron G6900TE 1.53
+164%

Celeron G6900TE outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x5-Z8350 891
Celeron G6900TE 2373
+166%

Celeron G6900TE outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 166% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 1.53
Recency 8 February 2016 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

The Celeron G6900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-Z8350 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 356 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8350 or Celeron G6900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.