Xeon Gold 6530 vs Atom x5-Z8330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8330
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.52
Xeon Gold 6530
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
42.37
+8048%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms Atom x5-Z8330 by a whopping 8048% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking275748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Architecture codenameAirmont (2015−2016)Emerald Rapids
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.44 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB160 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)no data270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Identity Protection+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-RS 1600DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size2 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes180
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8330 0.52
Xeon Gold 6530 42.37
+8048%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms Atom x5-Z8330 by 8048% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x5-Z8330 809
Xeon Gold 6530 65533
+8000%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms Atom x5-Z8330 by 8000% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 42.37
Recency 8 February 2016 1 October 2023
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64

The Xeon Gold 6530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-Z8330 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6530 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8330 and Xeon Gold 6530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Xeon Gold 6530
Xeon Gold 6530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8330 or Xeon Gold 6530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.