EPYC 9575F vs Atom x5-Z8330

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Turin (2024)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,791

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed1.44 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-RS 1600DDR5
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1128
USB revision3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 February 2016 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

EPYC 9575F has an age advantage of 8 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom x5-Z8330 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8330 and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Atom x5-Z8330
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 9 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8330 or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.