Atom x7213RE vs x5-Z8330
Primary details
Comparing Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2849 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 5x Intel Atom | no data |
| Architecture codename | Airmont (2016) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 8 February 2016 (8 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $42 |
Detailed specifications
Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.92 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| Identity Protection | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 1 | 9 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 February 2016 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Atom x5-Z8330 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Atom x7213RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8330 and Atom x7213RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
