Celeron B730 vs Atom x5-Z8300
Primary details
Comparing Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2753 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 5x Intel Atom | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail (2016) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 July 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $70 |
| Current price | $197 | $14.38 (0.2x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.44 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.84 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | UTFCBGA592 | G2 (988B) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| FMA | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 1 | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Atom x5-Z8300 outperforms Celeron B730 by 39% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 March 2015 | 1 July 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
We couldn't decide between Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron B730, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
