i5-13600KF vs Atom x5-E3940

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E3940
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.25
Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
24.26
+1841%

Core i5-13600KF outperforms Atom x5-E3940 by a whopping 1841% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2307212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.34
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel AtomIntel Core i5
Power efficiency11.6112.45
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache56K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E3940 1.25
i5-13600KF 24.26
+1841%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E3940 1953
i5-13600KF 37816
+1836%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 24.26
Recency 30 August 2014 27 September 2022
Physical cores 4 14
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 125 Watt

Atom x5-E3940 has 1150% lower power consumption.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has a 1840.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 250% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Core i5-13600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3940 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-E3940 is a notebook processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3940 and Core i5-13600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E3940
Atom x5-E3940
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 7 votes

Rate Atom x5-E3940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1842 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E3940 or Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.