Celeron G6900E vs Atom x5-E3940
Primary details
Comparing Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2309 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 5x Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 30 August 2014 (10 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 500 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 30 August 2014 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 46 Watt |
Atom x5-E3940 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 360% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has 270.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom x5-E3940 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
