EPYC 75F3 vs Atom x5-E3930

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E3930
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.60
EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.43
+7305%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 7305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking277249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.20
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series5x Intel AtomAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data29.5
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketIntel BGA 1296SP3
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E3930 0.60
EPYC 75F3 44.43
+7305%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E3930 928
EPYC 75F3 68505
+7282%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 44.43
Recency 30 August 2014 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 280 Watt

Atom x5-E3930 has 3900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has a 7305% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-E3930 is a notebook processor while EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3930 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E3930 or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.