i7-11700F vs Atom x5-E3930

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E3930
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.58
Core i7-11700F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.21
+2178%

Core i7-11700F outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 2178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2801562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiency7.8419.23
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache56K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E3930 0.58
i7-11700F 13.21
+2178%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E3930 928
i7-11700F 20989
+2162%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 13.21
Recency 30 August 2014 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 65 Watt

Atom x5-E3930 has 828.6% lower power consumption.

i7-11700F, on the other hand, has a 2177.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i7-11700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-E3930 is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3930 and Core i7-11700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930
Intel Core i7-11700F
Core i7-11700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 965 votes

Rate Core i7-11700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E3930 or Core i7-11700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.