Xeon D-2876NT vs Atom x3-3205RK
Primary details
Comparing Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Silvermont (2015) | no data |
| Release date | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Mali-450 MP4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 March 2015 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 100 Watt |
Atom x3-3205RK has 4900% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2876NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom x3-3205RK is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2876NT is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x3-3205RK and Xeon D-2876NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
