Atom x7203C vs x3-3205RK

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameSilvermont (2015)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Detailed specifications

Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardMali-450 MP4N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2015 8 April 2024
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 9 Watt

Atom x3-3205RK has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 350% lower power consumption.

Atom x7203C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x3-3205RK and Atom x7203C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x3-3205RK
Atom x3-3205RK
Intel Atom x7203C
Atom x7203C

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x3-3205RK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7203C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x3-3205RK or Atom x7203C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.