Ultra 9 288V vs Atom Z670

Place in the ranking	3382	623
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Atom	no data
Power efficiency	3.15	39.50
Architecture codename	Lincroft (2010−2011)	Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date	11 April 2011 (13 years ago)	24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$75	no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	5.1 GHz
Bus type	cDMI	no data
Bus rate	400 MT/s	37 MHz
Multiplier	8	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	192 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	45 nm	3 nm
Die size	65 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	140 million	no data
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	T-PBGA518	Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)	3 Watt	30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-

Security technologies

Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR2	DDR5
Maximum memory size	2.93 GB	no data
Max memory channels	1	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	3.2 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

PowerVR SGX535

Arc 140V

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

LVDS

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	4
PCI support	-	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z670 0.10

Ultra 9 288V 12.52
+12420%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z670 158

Ultra 9 288V 19895
+12492%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z670 497

Ultra 9 288V 10697
+2052%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z670 759

Ultra 9 288V 45377
+5879%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom Z670 151

Ultra 9 288V 9
+1578%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Atom Z670 0

Ultra 9 288V 20
+8895%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.10	12.52
Recency	11 April 2011	24 September 2024
Physical cores	1	8
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	45 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	3 Watt	30 Watt

Atom Z670 has 900% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 12420% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z670 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.