Ultra 7 265F vs Atom Z600

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date4 May 2010 (14 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typecDMIno data
Bus rate400 MT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size65.2526 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature+90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketT-PBGA5181851
Power consumption (TDP)1.3 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIO+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access-no data
AMT-no data
Matrix Storage-no data
Quiet System-no data
Quick Resume-no data
HD Audio-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5
Maximum memory size1 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535N/A
Max video memory256 MBno data
Clear Video+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs.

LVDS+no data
MIPI+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe versionNone5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20
PCI support-no data
USB revision2.0no data
Integrated IDENoneno data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LANNoneno data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 65 Watt

Atom Z600 has 6400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has 1900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z600 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z600 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z600
Atom Z600
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom Z600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z600 or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.