Athlon 3000G vs Atom Z600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Athlon
Power efficiencyno data7.63
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date4 May 2010 (14 years ago)7 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz - 1200 MHz (1 core)3.5 GHz
Bus typecDMIPCIe 3.0
Bus rate400 MT/sno data
Multiplier835
L1 cache56 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size65.2526 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature+90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 million4940 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketT-PBGA518AM4
Power consumption (TDP)1.3 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIO+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access-no data
AMT-no data
Matrix Storage-no data
Quiet System-no data
Quick Resume-no data
HD Audio-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Max video memory256 MBno data
Clear Video+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs.

LVDS+no data
MIPI+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionNone3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
PCI support-no data
USB revision2.0no data
Integrated IDENoneno data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LANNoneno data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2010 7 November 2019
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 35 Watt

Atom Z600 has 3400% lower power consumption.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z600 is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z600 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z600
Atom Z600
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom Z600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2060 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z600 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.