A10-4657M vs Atom Z540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z540
2008, $160
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.13

A10-4657M outperforms Atom Z540 by a whopping 677% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36502731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.291.22
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date2 April 2008 (18 years ago)1 April 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom Z540 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size24.18 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million1303 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.75 -1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z540 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA441BGA
Power consumption (TDP)2.4 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z540 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z540 and A10-4657M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z540 and A10-4657M are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom Z540 0.13
A10-4657M 1.01
+677%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom Z540 227
Samples: 1
A10-4657M 1759
+675%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 1.01
Recency 2 April 2008 1 April 2013
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 35 Watt

Atom Z540 has 1650% lower power consumption.

A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 677% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z540 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Atom Z540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom Z540 and A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.