Processor U300 vs Atom Z530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z530
2008, $95
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.10
Processor U300
2023, $193
5 cores / 6 threads, 15 Watt
4.97
+4870%

Processor U300 outperforms Atom Z530 by a whopping 4870% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36521393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.97
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency4.8835.60
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date2 April 2008 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$95$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom Z530 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s55 MHz
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size24.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.75 -1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z530 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA441Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z530 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z530 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z530 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z530 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z530 and Processor U300.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom Z530 0.10
Processor U300 4.97
+4870%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z530 537
Processor U300 8897
+1557%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z530 818
Processor U300 25107
+2971%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 4.97
Recency 2 April 2008 4 January 2023
Physical cores 1 5
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

Atom Z530 has 650% lower power consumption.

Processor U300, on the other hand, has a 4870% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 400% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Processor U300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z530 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z530
Atom Z530
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Atom Z530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 19 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom Z530 and Processor U300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.