Celeron N5095 vs Atom Z530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1637
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.90
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Jasper Lake
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$95no data
Current price$451 (4.7x MSRP)$1654

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus support533.33 MT/sno data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size24.18 mm27.8 mm × 3.1 mmno data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.75 -1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA441FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data+
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-750 MHz
Execution Units-16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom Z530 183
Celeron N5095 4085
+2132%

Celeron N5095 outperforms Atom Z530 by 2132% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom Z530 537
Celeron N5095 3545
+560%

Celeron N5095 outperforms Atom Z530 by 560% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom Z530 818
Celeron N5095 12283
+1403%

Celeron N5095 outperforms Atom Z530 by 1403% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom Z530 459
Celeron N5095 5272
+1050%

Celeron N5095 outperforms Atom Z530 by 1050% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom Z530 123.05
Celeron N5095 19.49
+531%

Atom Z530 outperforms Celeron N5095 by 531% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 11 January 2021
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z530 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z530 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z530
Atom Z530
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 9 votes

Rate Atom Z530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1260 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z530 or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.