Ultra 5 245KF vs Atom Z520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z520
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.54
+34325%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Atom Z520 by a whopping 34325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3398176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.94
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency3.7720.74
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed1.33 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size24.18 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.75-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA4411851
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z520 0.08
Ultra 5 245KF 27.54
+34325%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z520 122
Ultra 5 245KF 43751
+35761%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 27.54
Recency 2 April 2008 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 125 Watt

Atom Z520 has 6150% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 34325% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 1300% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z520 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 27 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z520 or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.