Celeron M 333 vs Atom Z520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3726not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomCeleron M
Power efficiency1.48no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Banias (2003)
Release date2 April 2008 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s400 MHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size24.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.75-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA441no data
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron M 333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z520 and Celeron M 333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron M 333 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 5 Watt

Atom Z520 has 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom Z520 and Intel Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
Intel Celeron M 333
Celeron M 333

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 35 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom Z520 and Celeron M 333, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.