A8-4557M vs Atom Z520
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3730 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.48 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Silverthorne (2008−2010) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 2 April 2008 (18 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Atom Z520 and A8-4557M: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 533.33 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10 | no data |
| L1 cache | 56 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 24.18 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 47 Million | 1303 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.75-1.1V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z520 and A8-4557M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | PBGA441 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and A8-4557M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z520 and A8-4557M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and A8-4557M are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | AMD Radeon HD 7640G (497 - 655 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 April 2008 | 15 May 2012 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom Z520 has 1650% lower power consumption.
A8-4557M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom Z520 and AMD A8-4557M. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
