Xeon 6780E vs Atom Z515

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z515
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 1 Watt
0.12
Xeon 6780E
2024
144 cores / 144 threads, 330 Watt
49.35
+41025%

Xeon 6780E outperforms Atom Z515 by a whopping 41025% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking357545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.28
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency7.806.32
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date8 April 2009 (16 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)144
Threads1144
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate400 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache0 KB108 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size26 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors47 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketPBGA441FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)1.4 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data88

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom Z515 0.12
Xeon 6780E 49.35
+41025%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom Z515 218
Xeon 6780E 86734
+39686%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 49.35
Recency 8 April 2009 3 June 2024
Physical cores 1 144
Threads 1 144
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 330 Watt

Atom Z515 has 32900% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has a 41025% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and 14300% more physical cores and 14300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6780E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z515 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z515 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6780E is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z515
Atom Z515
Intel Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Atom Z515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom Z515 and Xeon 6780E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.