EPYC 9275F vs Atom Z3770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37$3,439

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed1.46 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.39 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketUTFCBGA1380SP5
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 320 Watt

Atom Z3770 has 3900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z3770 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3770 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3770 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.