i9-13900F vs Atom Z3770

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z3770
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.46
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
32.27
+6915%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Atom Z3770 by a whopping 6915% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2919125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.4446.98
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.46 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.39 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z3770 0.46
i9-13900F 32.27
+6915%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3770 736
i9-13900F 51259
+6865%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 32.27
Recency 27 September 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 65 Watt

Atom Z3770 has 712.5% lower power consumption.

i9-13900F, on the other hand, has a 6915.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z3770 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3770 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 156 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3770 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.