Celeron N2815 vs Atom Z3740

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39
+25.8%
Celeron N2815
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.31

Atom Z3740 outperforms Celeron N2815 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30273111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency18.583.94
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$32$107

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2.13 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1066
Maximum memory size4 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency667 MHz756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z3740 0.39
+25.8%
Celeron N2815 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3740 621
+25.5%
Celeron N2815 495

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z3740 963
Celeron N2815 1068
+10.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z3740 3380
+65.8%
Celeron N2815 2038

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom Z3740 29
+99.3%
Celeron N2815 57.8

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom Z3740 0.7
+630%
Celeron N2815 0.1

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Atom Z3740 1569
+164%
Celeron N2815 594

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Atom Z3740 2617
+94.9%
Celeron N2815 1343

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Atom Z3740 792
+1.4%
Celeron N2815 781

Geekbench 2

Atom Z3740 2592
+35.2%
Celeron N2815 1917

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 0.31
Recency 27 September 2013 1 December 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 7 Watt

Atom Z3740 has a 25.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 250% lower power consumption.

Celeron N2815, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

The Atom Z3740 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2815 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3740 and Celeron N2815, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740
Intel Celeron N2815
Celeron N2815

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2815 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3740 or Celeron N2815, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.