EPYC 9654 vs Atom Z3735G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z3735G
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.49
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.73
+15355%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 15355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28916
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.29
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency23.1919.91
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$17$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed1.33 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache56K (per core)6 MB
L2 cache2 MB96 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size112 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketUTFCBGA592SP5
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth5.3 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency646 MHzno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z3735G 0.49
EPYC 9654 75.73
+15355%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3735G 772
EPYC 9654 120295
+15482%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 75.73
Recency 9 April 2014 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 360 Watt

Atom Z3735G has 17900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 15355.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z3735G is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3735G and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 66 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3735G or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.