Atom C3508 vs Z3735G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z3735G
2014, $17
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.44

Atom C3508 outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32342704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency9.283.94
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date9 April 2014 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$17no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache56K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache8 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size112 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA592FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size1 GB256 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth5.3 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency646 MHzno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom Z3735G 0.44
Atom C3508 1.05
+139%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom Z3735G 772
Samples: 289
Atom C3508 1831
+137%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 1.05
Recency 9 April 2014 15 August 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 11 Watt

Atom Z3735G has 450% lower power consumption.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has a 139% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Atom C3508 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z3735G in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z3735G is a notebook processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 80 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom Z3735G and Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.