EPYC 9475F vs Atom Z2560

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3180not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency7.22no data
Architecture codenameClovertrail (2013)Turin (2024)
Release date27 February 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,592

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speedno data3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size65 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 million66,520 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFC-MB4760SP5
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE32 Bitno data
Smart Idle+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth8.5 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)N/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128
USB revision2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0no data
Number of USB ports2no data
UART3no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 400 Watt

Atom Z2560 has 13233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z2560 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2560
Atom Z2560
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate Atom Z2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2560 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.