Athlon 750 vs Atom Z2520
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
Release date | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) | 29 November 1999 (24 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $799 |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 0.75 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | 65 mm2 | 102 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
Number of transistors | 140 million | 22 million |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FC-MB4760 | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Smart Idle | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750 are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | SGX 544MP2 | N/A |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750.
USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 2 | no data |
UART | 3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 27 February 2013 | 29 November 1999 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom Z2520 has an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom Z2520 is a notebook processor while Athlon 750 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2520 and Athlon 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.